tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14427379.post4062894489654705249..comments2023-05-30T15:20:21.068+02:00Comments on The Core Dump of Thought: Summaryzvrbahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08806965334872601252noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14427379.post-55590092305548364932007-07-11T18:23:00.000+02:002007-07-11T18:23:00.000+02:00I'm just impressed in general; I didn't even compa...I'm just impressed in general; I didn't even compare it yet to g++. Actually, I have bad experience with compiling GCC/GDB on Solaris. Version 4.1 wouldn't compile (some configure f*up), version 4.2 compiles, but gdb has problems debugging 64-bit applications (crashes although it has been compiled with 64-bit support).<BR/><BR/>I've come to like the Sun's toolset and dbx, despite some of the compiler's bugs, much more than gcc.zvrbahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08806965334872601252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14427379.post-8052559838558872532007-07-11T16:30:00.000+02:002007-07-11T16:30:00.000+02:00Are you comparing Sun's C++ to g++ or are you impr...Are you comparing Sun's C++ to g++ or are you impressed in general? Recently I reviewed a smart pointer implementation and was pleasantly surprised with the optimizations that g++ performed. It could be that, since the advent of STL (and, to some extent, boost), the state of the art of C++ optimization has greatly improved.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com